The Stop Sign as a platform

feh.

Where’s my “moaning” stencil?

Comment by Mark Dowling
July 21, 2008 @ 9:53 am

“Stop … Hammertime” is great. Otherwise they tend to be obnoxious and whiny. The “Stop … Eating Animals” one always makes me hungry for veal chops.

Comment by Andrew
July 21, 2008 @ 10:09 am

Close to home is this one on Augusta:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tlonista/1004266160/

And “Hammer Time” seems popular, I shot this one in New Orleans:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/egnaro/2652057416/in/set-72157606055199030/

Comment by Rick Mason
July 21, 2008 @ 10:21 am

The most common one on Long Island is certainly “Driving SUV’s” but over time people have covered the SUV part with red lipstick.

Comment by Kevin Bracken
July 21, 2008 @ 11:33 am

I like the “Stop, Really” at Woodmount and Mortimer. I think it actually works, too.

Comment by Leo Gonzalez
July 21, 2008 @ 1:14 pm

Are you not the least bit uneasy that this supports vandalism? The very street where Spacing is located is disgracefully covered in graffiti. Promoting such blight is stupid. Shame on Spacing.

Comment by Glen
July 21, 2008 @ 1:40 pm

I first saw these in Toronto in the Carleton Village area near St. Clair and Old Weston Road.

One was Stop
Racism

Comment by A.R.
July 21, 2008 @ 3:34 pm

Thanks for the moralizing comment, Glen. I suspect there will always be those who see any form of graffiti as vandalism.

But what I like about the STOP signs is that no one ever covers up to most important part of the sign: STOP. its usually integral to the graffiti and it rarely, if ever, detracts from the purpose of the STOP sign. You could even remove the word STOP and just keep the red octagon and people would obey it.

And I don’t think Spacing is actively promoting this “blight”, since I saw nowhere in this post stating “go out and paint STOP signs”. There’s a difference between appreciation and promotion. But I think Glen sees this as a black & white issue, which is fair enough, so any form of nuance on this topic will be lost on him.

Comment by Mookie
July 21, 2008 @ 3:44 pm

How about the old Montreal version:

STOP turned into

101

Comment by mikeb
July 21, 2008 @ 3:47 pm

Good old ‘loi 101′. Reminds me of my early-90s days at McGill. Should have bought property then when it was worth nothing due to ‘law 401′, as in get on the 401 and out of here.

Nearly all of my Jewish friends in Toronto have roots in Montreal, but their families left after the ‘Quiet Revolution’. Paranoid in retrospect, but one bout of 20th century nationalism almost did European Jewry in. Besides, ‘Quebec for Quebecois’ banners at St.J.P. marches, and Parizeau’s losing ‘money and ethnic vote’ speech, makes even this anglo not want to move back.

Very glad to have a French Quebec in Canada, esp as they lead on social policy, which keeps us from becoming like America, or Alberta. However, wish the uglier aspects of Quebecois pride were much less tolerated within their own community.

Comment by jamesmallon
July 21, 2008 @ 3:58 pm

This reminds me of the time, a few years ago now, when some wag painted over the lower half of a pedestrian signal - the orange part with the hand - in black paint. Then, they stencilled out the word “DANCE” where the hand used to be. (This was the signal at northeast corner of Queen’s Park circle, leading to Victoria College.)

So, when it was time to walk, the little white pedestrian would be illuminated. Then, when it was time to walk faster, the signal would start flashing “DANCE - DANCE - DANCE - DANCE!”

Comment by Ivor
July 21, 2008 @ 7:25 pm

The political and “clever” messages on STOP signs are all very amusing.
However, if any of this graffiti detracts from the original intention of the signs and creates an unsafe intersection, then strict policing of the practice is necessary.
Some vandals have even removed STOP signs - with tragic results.
Messing with public safety is no laughing matter!

Comment by George Dunbar
July 21, 2008 @ 9:50 pm

I think the signs are fun, and I don’t have a problem with graffiti, but as a constant pedestrian I want to make sure the stop signs are as visible as possible, and without distraction. Of course I would accept the addition - Stop (photo radar).

Comment by Monarda
July 21, 2008 @ 10:47 pm

These signs are quite common in Berkeley, Calif. The STOP portion of the sign is not tampered with; there’s just a clever add-on beneath it.

Comment by Georgia
July 22, 2008 @ 12:45 am

Actually, speaking of Montreal, the best ones are when they turn ARRET into A R T

Comment by Kevin Bracken
July 22, 2008 @ 10:08 am

These are almost all lame vehicles for teenage expression. I’m pretty sure low public opinion of the Bush presidency was not ignited by something a 14 year-old stencilled on a traffic sign.

Comment by leonard
July 22, 2008 @ 11:52 am

The first time I ever saw a converted STOP sign was in Washington DC in the 1980s, where many had been made to read:
STOP U.S. WAR IN EL SALVADOR

Comment by Larry
July 23, 2008 @ 11:31 am

When I lived near McGill, I saw that one of the “ARRàŠT” signs had been made to say “ARRàŠT EATING ANIMALS”, which is so horribly ungrammatical that it almost doesn’t make sense. (For a start, “arràªt” is the noun form of “stop”, not the verb form.)

As a vegetarian myself, I choose to believe that the graffiti artist was being deliberately absurd rather than just ignorant.

Comment by Ted C.
July 27, 2008 @ 4:05 pm

I’ve got a “Hammer Time” right outside my house, at the intersection of Aldwych and Eaton Avenues.

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y50/RuddyRuddy/stop.jpg

If you ever see it, I’ll be the guy in the yard nearby wearing the golden parachute pants.

Comment by Peter Lynn
July 28, 2008 @ 2:04 pm

also the walking sign
ttp://www.mwarchitects.com.au

Comment by peter mcgregor
December 2, 2008 @ 6:41 am