{"id":2270,"date":"2007-09-04T16:49:20","date_gmt":"2007-09-04T20:49:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spacingtoronto.ca\/?p=2270"},"modified":"2007-09-05T12:33:41","modified_gmt":"2007-09-05T16:33:41","slug":"city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/","title":{"rendered":"City Hall: Good, bad and ugly"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Good:<\/strong> The Executive Committee has the capital budget variance report<\/a> for the first four months of 2007 before it today. The report\u00a0says that the City is on pace to complete 89 percent of its 2007 capital budget. This is great news given that completion rates for the City’s capital program have been under 70 percent every year since amalgamation.<\/p>\n

The tide started to turn on this in 2005, when City Council re-jigged the budget approval process. Prior to that point, Council had always considered the capital budget along with the far more labourious operating budget. Delaying approval of the capital budget until operating was ready prevented City staff from tendering contracts until spring. In turn, there was little time to get projects done before December 31, the end of the fiscal year.<\/p>\n

Now the Miller Administration has the capital program to Council for approval in February while operating is done in March or April.<\/p>\n

Budget Chief Shelley Carroll<\/a> has made increasing the capital program completion rate a priority,\u00a0so kudos to her for getting results on this front.<\/p>\n

The Bad:<\/strong> City Council made a political decision during the last term to levy residential development charges at 18 percent below the highest level allowed under the provincial Development Charges Act. If the City were to increase development charges by that 18 percent, it could add $20 million<\/a> to its capital budget annually. Given the rate of condo construction and the City’s financial position, I see\u00a0little reason\u00a0for giving\u00a0residential developers a break.<\/p>\n

Even though provincial law dictates development charges can only be used for specific types of capital projects (i.e., they can’t be used to close the gap in the City’s operating budget), every penny counts if you can make room for other capital expenditures.<\/p>\n

The Ugly:<\/strong> According<\/a> to Auditor General Jeffery Griffiths<\/a>, 29 of the 45 Members of Council had at least one irregularity in their 2006 election campaign financial statements. Though some seem legitimately explained away (for example, a couple of councillors who have spouses with different last names than their own received donations from their spouses that totalled more than the legal limit for non-spousal donations), others look a little suspicious to me.<\/p>\n

Take, for example, Councillor Cesar Palacio<\/a>. Auditor General Griffiths notes, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The Councillor declared a surplus as of January 2, 2007. A contribution of $750 was accepted on Jan 24, 2007. Acceptance of contributions is not allowed after a surplus is declared.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Although similar to the responses\u00a0of many other observations made by Griffiths, Palacio’s office informed the AG that the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Councillor has advised the City Clerk.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d (Whatever that means.)<\/p>\n

Overall, however, the flags raised by Griffiths simply\u00a0show lazy accounting practices and confusion over election rules. Whatever the 29 Members of Council noted in the report\u00a0have to say for themselves, it’s still ugly.<\/p>\n

Photo courtesy StarbucksGuy<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0 The Good: The Executive Committee has the capital budget variance report for the first four months of 2007 before it today. The report\u00a0says that the City is on pace to complete 89 percent of its 2007 capital budget. This is great news given that completion rates for the City’s capital program have been underContinue reading “City Hall: Good, bad and ugly”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4037,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_ef_editorial_meta_paragraph_assignment":"","_ef_editorial_meta_date_first-draft-date":"","_ef_editorial_meta_checkbox_needs-photo":"","_ef_editorial_meta_number_word-count":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2,20],"tags":[6674,6675,246,2211,756,5835,408,5134,6671,6672,6673,22085,934,1276,391],"class_list":["post-2270","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-urban-design","tag-aeoethe-councillor","tag-auditor-general","tag-cesar-palacio","tag-chief","tag-city-council","tag-clerk","tag-councillor","tag-executive-committee","tag-jeffery-griffiths","tag-lazy-accounting-practices","tag-miller-administration","tag-politics","tag-provincial-law","tag-shelley-carroll","tag-usd"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nCity Hall: Good, bad and ugly - Spacing Toronto<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"City Hall: Good, bad and ugly - Spacing Toronto\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u00a0 The Good: The Executive Committee has the capital budget variance report for the first four months of 2007 before it today. The report\u00a0says that the City is on pace to complete 89 percent of its 2007 capital budget. This is great news given that completion rates for the City’s capital program have been underContinue reading "City Hall: Good, bad and ugly"\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Spacing Toronto\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-09-04T20:49:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2007-09-05T16:33:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/farm1.static.flickr.com\/221\/466641174_141ab29170.jpg?v=0\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Adam Chaleff-Freudenthaler\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Spacing\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Spacing\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Adam Chaleff-Freudenthaler\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/\",\"name\":\"City Hall: Good, bad and ugly - Spacing Toronto\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/farm1.static.flickr.com\/221\/466641174_141ab29170.jpg?v=0\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-09-04T20:49:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2007-09-05T16:33:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/da656cba8e02a7aabb6c80c549dc7e72\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/farm1.static.flickr.com\/221\/466641174_141ab29170.jpg?v=0\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/farm1.static.flickr.com\/221\/466641174_141ab29170.jpg?v=0\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"City Hall: Good, bad and ugly\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/\",\"name\":\"Spacing Toronto\",\"description\":\"Canadian Urbanism Uncovered | Toronto Architecture, Urban Design, Public Transit, City Hall, Parks, Walking, Bikes, Streetscape, History, Waterfront, Maps, Public Spaces\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/da656cba8e02a7aabb6c80c549dc7e72\",\"name\":\"Adam Chaleff-Freudenthaler\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/73c02741f456d391a6979ebe8b8a600f?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/73c02741f456d391a6979ebe8b8a600f?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Adam Chaleff-Freudenthaler\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/wire\/?author=37\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/author\/adam\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"City Hall: Good, bad and ugly - Spacing Toronto","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"City Hall: Good, bad and ugly - Spacing Toronto","og_description":"\u00a0 The Good: The Executive Committee has the capital budget variance report for the first four months of 2007 before it today. The report\u00a0says that the City is on pace to complete 89 percent of its 2007 capital budget. This is great news given that completion rates for the City’s capital program have been underContinue reading \"City Hall: Good, bad and ugly\"","og_url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/","og_site_name":"Spacing Toronto","article_published_time":"2007-09-04T20:49:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2007-09-05T16:33:41+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/farm1.static.flickr.com\/221\/466641174_141ab29170.jpg?v=0","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Adam Chaleff-Freudenthaler","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Spacing","twitter_site":"@Spacing","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Adam Chaleff-Freudenthaler","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/","url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/","name":"City Hall: Good, bad and ugly - Spacing Toronto","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/farm1.static.flickr.com\/221\/466641174_141ab29170.jpg?v=0","datePublished":"2007-09-04T20:49:20+00:00","dateModified":"2007-09-05T16:33:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/da656cba8e02a7aabb6c80c549dc7e72"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/farm1.static.flickr.com\/221\/466641174_141ab29170.jpg?v=0","contentUrl":"http:\/\/farm1.static.flickr.com\/221\/466641174_141ab29170.jpg?v=0"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2007\/09\/04\/city-hall-good-bad-and-ugly\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"City Hall: Good, bad and ugly"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website","url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/","name":"Spacing Toronto","description":"Canadian Urbanism Uncovered | Toronto Architecture, Urban Design, Public Transit, City Hall, Parks, Walking, Bikes, Streetscape, History, Waterfront, Maps, Public Spaces","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/da656cba8e02a7aabb6c80c549dc7e72","name":"Adam Chaleff-Freudenthaler","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/73c02741f456d391a6979ebe8b8a600f?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/73c02741f456d391a6979ebe8b8a600f?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"Adam Chaleff-Freudenthaler"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/spacing.ca\/wire\/?author=37"],"url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/author\/adam\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2270","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4037"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2270"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2270\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2270"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2270"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2270"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}