{"id":50028,"date":"2014-10-22T07:30:24","date_gmt":"2014-10-22T11:30:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/?p=50028"},"modified":"2014-10-21T22:08:17","modified_gmt":"2014-10-22T02:08:17","slug":"lorinc-defense-strategists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/","title":{"rendered":"LORINC: In defense of the strategists"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"feature-lorinc\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Pop math quiz: what\u2019s a strategic vote worth, anyway?<\/p>\n

Seventy-five percent of an “authentic” vote, or maybe just 50%? How shall we calculate a coefficient that truly captures the degree of dilution? Call it `h,\u2019 for hedge.<\/p>\n

These are deliberately snarky questions, of course. But the surge of partisan handwringing about the implications of strategic voting in next Monday\u2019s election demands a considered answer to the following question:<\/p>\n

Why is strategic voting dangerous, as numerous pundits (here<\/a>, here<\/a> and here<\/a>, this latter penned by Olivia Chow\u2019s senior strategist Jamey Heath) have said in recent days, and what makes this particular type of political decision so much less, well, worthy than other forms of electoral choice?<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s first lay to rest the old and tired complaint about polls, and the way they apparently distort the electoral process. Yes, they do, but the results aren\u2019t necessarily negative. After all, when the polls are in your candidate\u2019s sails, so to speak, then polls are good and important.<\/p>\n

Case in point: a pair of turning point polls for David Miller, released in the late summer\/early fall of the 2003 race, which showed him pulling abreast of Barbara Hall for the first time and then surpassing her. Those polls unleashed a wave of donations and volunteers, injected energy into his campaign, and brought more supporters into his camp. Why? Because lots of people read those polls and then made a strategic decision to abandon Hall \u2014 the putative front-runner and centre-left standard-bearer \u2014 in favour of Miller.<\/p>\n

Perhaps the particular complaint about poll-based voting in this race has to do with the notorious inaccuracy of the Forum polls. That complaint would be more compelling if poll numbers were the only data point that voters used to make up their minds. But they\u2019re not.
\nThe reality is that the choice between candidates is difficult and multi-dimensional, and the factors that determine an individual\u2019s vote can take into account a wide range of influences: the three-Ps that the campaign can control \u2014 platform, positioning, performance \u2014 but also word-of-mouth, media depictions, neighbourhood politics, side-shows, macro social or economic conditions, gut.<\/p>\n

What\u2019s more, we live in a world, like it or not, where we constantly make ordinary decisions based on numerous considerations, some of them worthy, others less so. Who\u2019s ever bought a book simply because it was on the New York Times bestseller list? Or shopped at a certain retailer because it\u2019s on one of BlogTO\u2019s top ten round-ups? Chosen a restaurant because it\u2019s busy? Bought a bottle of wine because of its label and price point? Attended a film based on nothing more substantial than a thumb\u2019s up recommendation and a free evening? And on, and on.<\/p>\n

Then there\u2019s the psychology of siding with a winner, or a perceived winner. Many people, for example, buy cars merely because they\u2019re popular, with claims of consumer popularity itself serving as a kind of proxy for quality.<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t want to equate ordinary consumer decisions with votes \u2013 these are obviously profoundly different actions, with sharply different consequences. What\u2019s more, a poll result is clearly not the same sort of data as information about a bestselling product, because the poll anticipates a result that has yet to take place.<\/p>\n

Still, the mental processes are necessarily similar \u2013 the constant weighing and re-weighing of incomplete information, and the ever-present struggle to find some kind of balance between image and authenticity, quality and fad.<\/p>\n

In this election, I\u2019d argue, the ballot question has always been about the continued presence of the Fords atop our rickety civic pyramid. We talked about all sorts of other things, of course, but the self-evident common denominator between the vast majority of John Tory\u2019s backers and Chow\u2019s is that neither group wanted a Ford in the mayor\u2019s office.<\/p>\n

And so it followed that Chow and Tory were forced to spend the past ten months presenting voters with alternative models. The two camps argued, as they should, about which candidate offered up a more meaningful difference. All that positioning, plus the polling plus a hundred other factors, brought us to now.<\/p>\n

Yet if Chow had run a stronger campaign, and if Tory had run a weaker one, would we be hearing the same kind of fretting about strategic voting? What if we had reached October 22, and Chow, Tory and Doug Ford were neck-and-neck-and-neck? I\u2019d say the calls for strategic voting would be coming fast and furious from both the Tory and Chow camps. So this stuff cuts both ways.<\/p>\n

The other point to make here has to do with the underlying effectiveness of the two campaigns, a topic about which much digital ink has already been spilled. Let me add these observations:<\/p>\n

Chow\u2019s value proposition was fundamentally and fatally descriptive \u2014 her campaign fore-grounded the way she personally reflected the city as it exists in 2014, and then added in some relatively modest programs as proof of concept. What it lacked was a big move, and a specific, as opposed to general, vision of the future.<\/p>\n

Tory, in what can only be described as a monumentally ironic twist, proved to be far more adroit at delivering a campaign informed by Jack Layton-style propositional politics. He led with one ambitious idea, just as David Miller did in 2003, and used that pitch as a means of illustrating not just his approach to leadership, but a fairly specific picture of the city\u2019s future.<\/p>\n

To counter Ford, in sum, the conservative ran on a spending platform, and the social democrat campaigned on an austerity program. That was the choice, in a nutshell.<\/p>\n

Late-in-the-race polls may push voters in one direction or another. But the notion that these decisions can be divorced from everything else that transpired in this crazy race presumes a hopelessly disengaged electorate. Moreover, the strategic voting allegation implies that Chow was entitled to the voters on the centre-left.<\/p>\n

The reality is that we\u2019ve trudged through an exhausting election that posed extremely thorny questions, none of which are easily reduced to the either\/or dynamic of voting. I respect the fact that many Chow\u2019s backers have issues about strategic voting at this late stage. But I\u2019d hope they don\u2019t, in the process, belittle the decision-making processes of the many progressive-minded Torontonians who were genuinely torn about what to do. Surely, their votes also count.<\/p>\n

photo by Steve Rotman<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Pop math quiz: what\u2019s a strategic vote worth, anyway? Seventy-five percent of an “authentic” vote, or maybe just 50%? How shall we calculate a coefficient that truly captures the degree of dilution? Call it `h,\u2019 for hedge. These are deliberately snarky questions, of course. But the surge of partisan handwringing about the implications of strategicContinue reading “LORINC: In defense of the strategists”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4051,"featured_media":50033,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_ef_editorial_meta_paragraph_assignment":"","_ef_editorial_meta_date_first-draft-date":"","_ef_editorial_meta_checkbox_needs-photo":"","_ef_editorial_meta_number_word-count":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50028","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nLORINC: In defense of the strategists - Spacing Toronto<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"LORINC: In defense of the strategists - Spacing Toronto\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Pop math quiz: what\u2019s a strategic vote worth, anyway? Seventy-five percent of an “authentic” vote, or maybe just 50%? How shall we calculate a coefficient that truly captures the degree of dilution? Call it `h,\u2019 for hedge. These are deliberately snarky questions, of course. But the surge of partisan handwringing about the implications of strategicContinue reading "LORINC: In defense of the strategists"\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Spacing Toronto\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-10-22T11:30:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2014\/10\/vote-graffiti.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"921\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"576\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John Lorinc\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Spacing\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Spacing\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"John Lorinc\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/\",\"name\":\"LORINC: In defense of the strategists - Spacing Toronto\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2014\/10\/vote-graffiti.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-10-22T11:30:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/faff9da0e20b8f5223099d707e940d8e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2014\/10\/vote-graffiti.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2014\/10\/vote-graffiti.jpg\",\"width\":921,\"height\":576},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"LORINC: In defense of the strategists\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/\",\"name\":\"Spacing Toronto\",\"description\":\"Canadian Urbanism Uncovered | Toronto Architecture, Urban Design, Public Transit, City Hall, Parks, Walking, Bikes, Streetscape, History, Waterfront, Maps, Public Spaces\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/faff9da0e20b8f5223099d707e940d8e\",\"name\":\"John Lorinc\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/73e05cb61860b63be76ffccf72a4d736?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/73e05cb61860b63be76ffccf72a4d736?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"John Lorinc\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/author\/john\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"LORINC: In defense of the strategists - Spacing Toronto","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"LORINC: In defense of the strategists - Spacing Toronto","og_description":"Pop math quiz: what\u2019s a strategic vote worth, anyway? Seventy-five percent of an “authentic” vote, or maybe just 50%? How shall we calculate a coefficient that truly captures the degree of dilution? Call it `h,\u2019 for hedge. These are deliberately snarky questions, of course. But the surge of partisan handwringing about the implications of strategicContinue reading \"LORINC: In defense of the strategists\"","og_url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/","og_site_name":"Spacing Toronto","article_published_time":"2014-10-22T11:30:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":921,"height":576,"url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2014\/10\/vote-graffiti.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"John Lorinc","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Spacing","twitter_site":"@Spacing","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"John Lorinc","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/","url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/","name":"LORINC: In defense of the strategists - Spacing Toronto","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2014\/10\/vote-graffiti.jpg","datePublished":"2014-10-22T11:30:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/faff9da0e20b8f5223099d707e940d8e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2014\/10\/vote-graffiti.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2014\/10\/vote-graffiti.jpg","width":921,"height":576},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2014\/10\/22\/lorinc-defense-strategists\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"LORINC: In defense of the strategists"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website","url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/","name":"Spacing Toronto","description":"Canadian Urbanism Uncovered | Toronto Architecture, Urban Design, Public Transit, City Hall, Parks, Walking, Bikes, Streetscape, History, Waterfront, Maps, Public Spaces","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/faff9da0e20b8f5223099d707e940d8e","name":"John Lorinc","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/73e05cb61860b63be76ffccf72a4d736?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/73e05cb61860b63be76ffccf72a4d736?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"John Lorinc"},"url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/author\/john\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50028","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4051"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50028"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50028\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50034,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50028\/revisions\/50034"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50033"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50028"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}