{"id":51792,"date":"2015-05-11T08:04:55","date_gmt":"2015-05-11T12:04:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/?p=51792"},"modified":"2015-05-11T16:14:27","modified_gmt":"2015-05-11T20:14:27","slug":"rounding-error","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/","title":{"rendered":"LORINC: Tearing down Gardiner East is all in the numbers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2013\/06\/feature-lorinc.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-44316\" src=\"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2013\/06\/feature-lorinc.gif\" alt=\"feature-lorinc\" width=\"600\" height=\"85\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Does the melodrama over the projected two- to ten-minute delay that <em>may<\/em> occur due to the removal of the lower portion of the Gardiner resemble a farce that\u2019s played out in Toronto before?<\/p>\n<p>Absolutely. We went through this whole charade about a decade ago, on St. Clair West, when the Toronto Transit Commission released a report projecting that the travel times along the corridor would fall by a whopping two minutes if the city built a dedicated right-of-way for the 512 car.<\/p>\n<p>Opponents seized on that number to fulminate against the project: Why go to the enormous expense and disruption for a mere 120-second savings? they demanded. It seemed absurd.<\/p>\n<p>Today, I defy anyone \u2014 pro or con the right-of-way \u2014 to locate an individual who can accurately report the average delta in trip duration compared to their pre-ROW streetcar commutes. Travel times are subject to multiple and constantly changing variables: weather, accidents, construction, misplaced keys, short-cuts, whether your kid is acting up that morning, etc.<\/p>\n<p>This flux, moreover, exists both for transit users and drivers. Commute times, for individuals, fall in a broad band. The reality \u2014 unless your workplace is at the end of the block or on the dining room table \u2014 is that your trip can vary in duration by as much as 100%. A delay of a few minutes is a rounding error, nothing more.<\/p>\n<p>The scientists who make these <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cp24.com\/polopoly_fs\/1.2363519!\/httpFile\/file.pdf\">elaborate simulations<\/a> \u2014 all of which are built with\u00a0a confection of historical sample data, macro demographic and economic estimates that reach far into the future, and complex algorithms \u2014 know this. And yet we \u2014 by which I mean city officials, politicians and a gullible, math-phobic public \u2014 insist on treating these super-precise time projections as <em>facts<\/em>, the logical consequences of which will be baked into our infrastructure (and public finances) for generations to come.<\/p>\n<p>But they are not facts. They are guesses, and should be handled with extreme caution.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, we do just the opposite. Indeed, there\u2019s much in our public discourse to reinforce our belief in travel time predictions and estimates. The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thestar.com\/yourtoronto\/yourcitymycity\/2010\/03\/30\/toronto_commuting_times_worst_of_19_major_cities_study_says.html\">media loves to report on city-by-city commute time rankings<\/a>, and the most recent of these have given Greater Toronto dubious bragging rights as one of the most molten cities in the industrialized world.<\/p>\n<p>Civic Action, in a well-intentioned but misleading gesture, sought to whip up support for more transit investment with the <a href=\"http:\/\/your32.com\">\u201cYour 32\u201d campaign<\/a>, which encouraged commuters to ask what they\u2019d do with the extra half hour generated, at some indeterminate point in the future, by more investment in the GTA transit network. Is there was any way of doing a meaningful before-and-after comparison over periods that can extend for decades, during which lives, working conditions, travel patterns and the city\u2019s form are constantly shifting? Nope.<\/p>\n<p>The models, and the people who create them, try their best to factor in\u00a0the inherent dynamism of the problem \u2013 the fact that transportation systems consist of a limitless number of moving parts, random events and minute interactions \u2013 but the reality is that they simply can\u2019t account for what <a href=\"http:\/\/www.brainyquote.com\/quotes\/quotes\/d\/donaldrums148142.html\">Donald Rumsfeld<\/a> so memorably termed the \u201cunknown unknowns.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Case in point: Uber. Five years ago, it was just a $50 German word beloved of philosophy majors. Today, I\u2019d venture to say that Uber \u2014 and the companies that will imitate it \u2014 is poised to radically change the way we move around cities; these entrepreneurs\u00a0have yanked the ideal of wide-spread car-sharing from the middle-distance horizon into the here and now. And what about the next Uber, and the one after that? Or what about the fact that so many young people today <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fastcoexist.com\/3027876\/millennials-dont-care-about-owning-cars-and-car-makers-cant-figure-out-why\">are opting not to learn to drive or own cars<\/a>? Can those supposed two to ten minute delays account for future innovation, unexpected mass changes in habit or political course corrections? Of course not.<\/p>\n<p>Prognostications about urban development can be equally dodgy. In the 1980s, when the former Metro Council adopted its mass transit strategy, Network 2011, the prevailing assumption was that office\/employment uses were fleeing the downtown. Newspapers and business magazines were filled with breathless anecdotes about this or that company re-locating from the core to the suburbs.<\/p>\n<p>Consequently, politicians of that era adopted transportation infrastructure decisions based on the expectation that the trend would continue indefinitely. Thirty years later, we know those predictions didn\u2019t come to pass. We built it, they didn&#8217;t come. Indeed, the core is now by far the most robust employment district in the GTA, followed by mid-town. But the distant echoes of Network 2011, and the faulty policy assumptions which informed big plans, continue to drive infrastructure investment.<\/p>\n<p>Critics of this line of reasoning may say, &#8220;Wait, that was 30 years ago, things change.&#8221; But proposals like the so-called \u201chybrid\u201d version of the Gardiner East will be with us 30, 60 or a 100 years hence, just as the current tail of the Gardiner East stands as a testament to an earlier generation of flawed\u00a0transportation planning. We can plausibly estimate the cost to keep the thing from falling down in perpetuity. But the notion that anyone can predict, decades in advance, the way people will travel \u2014 and do so to such fine tolerances \u2014 is at best false and at worst highly misleading.<\/p>\n<p>Herein lies the mischief\u00a0in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.toronto.ca\/legdocs\/mmis\/2015\/pw\/bgrd\/backgroundfile-79902.pdf\">staff report<\/a> heading toward a council like a runaway train (it will be debated and presumably approved at the public works and infrastructure committee on Wednesday). Council, according to the report, can make a choice between two options: \u201cRemove [the Gardiner east of Jarvis], on the basis of greater emphasis on the EA urban design, environment and economics study lenses; or Hybrid, on the basis of greater emphasis on the EA transportation and infrastructure study lens.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s a false dichotomy, because the case for the (far more costly) hybrid option is built on a marshy foundation of statistically insignificant guesses about \u00a0improvements in travel times compared to the \u201cremove\u201d option.<\/p>\n<p>Council, of course, can\u2019t make a decision in an analytical vacuum (although god knows it happens often enough). In this case, however, the analysis is hidden in plain view: more than half a century of urban design and planning <em>experience<\/em> \u2013 as opposed to <em>prediction<\/em> \u2013 has proven\u00a0beyond a shadow of a doubt that highways and vibrant downtowns simply\u00a0do not mix.<\/p>\n<p>In a surprising spasm of self-awareness, council under David Miller drove a stake through the heart of Metro&#8217;s last\u00a0remaining downtown highway project \u2013 the Front Street Extension. Apparently, and ironically, we have since unlearned those lessons, even as a growing number of <a href=\"http:\/\/gizmodo.com\/6-freeway-demolitions-that-changed-their-cities-forever-1548314937\/+alissawalker\">forward-looking international cities<\/a> \u2013 including, of all places, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.citylab.com\/commute\/2015\/05\/houstons-urban-interstate-debate-transform-or-tear-down\/392546\/?utm_source=SFFB\">Houston<\/a>, which is now debating the removal of an extended elevated highway \u2013 have re-discovered why Jane Jacobs is still right, so many years later.<\/p>\n<p>So let\u2019s be perfectly clear about what confronts council in the next few weeks. It\u2019s not, as the staff report claims, a matter of selecting between comparably compelling options, each with strengths and weaknesses. Rather, the remove\/hybrid vote is a stark choice between certainty and guesswork, successful\u00a0urban planning and failed transportation planning, the city\u2019s future and the city\u2019s past. The Gardiner vote is about many things, but a tiny, and ultimately fictitious, slice of time saved from door to desk isn\u2019t one of them.<\/p>\n<p><em><a href=\"https:\/\/flic.kr\/p\/gGzgGi\">photo by Ashton Pal<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Does the melodrama over the projected two- to ten-minute delay that may occur due to the removal of the lower portion of the Gardiner resemble a farce that\u2019s played out in Toronto before? Absolutely. We went through this whole charade about a decade ago, on St. Clair West, when the Toronto Transit Commission released a<a href=\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"sr-only\">&#8220;LORINC: Tearing down Gardiner East is all in the numbers&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4051,"featured_media":51800,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_ef_editorial_meta_paragraph_assignment":"","_ef_editorial_meta_date_first-draft-date":"","_ef_editorial_meta_checkbox_needs-photo":"","_ef_editorial_meta_number_word-count":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[50,2,9,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51792","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-infrastructure","category-politics","category-traffic","category-transit"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>LORINC: Tearing down Gardiner East is all in the numbers - Spacing Toronto<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"LORINC: Tearing down Gardiner East is all in the numbers - Spacing Toronto\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Does the melodrama over the projected two- to ten-minute delay that may occur due to the removal of the lower portion of the Gardiner resemble a farce that\u2019s played out in Toronto before? Absolutely. We went through this whole charade about a decade ago, on St. Clair West, when the Toronto Transit Commission released aContinue reading &quot;LORINC: Tearing down Gardiner East is all in the numbers&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Spacing Toronto\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-05-11T12:04:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-11T20:14:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/05\/gardiner-ashton-pal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1067\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John Lorinc\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Spacing\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Spacing\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"John Lorinc\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/\",\"name\":\"LORINC: Tearing down Gardiner East is all in the numbers - Spacing Toronto\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/05\/gardiner-ashton-pal.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-05-11T12:04:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-11T20:14:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/faff9da0e20b8f5223099d707e940d8e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/05\/gardiner-ashton-pal.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/05\/gardiner-ashton-pal.jpg\",\"width\":1600,\"height\":1067},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"LORINC: Tearing down Gardiner East is all in the numbers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/\",\"name\":\"Spacing Toronto\",\"description\":\"Canadian Urbanism Uncovered  |  Toronto Architecture, Urban Design, Public Transit, City Hall, Parks, Walking, Bikes, Streetscape, History, Waterfront, Maps, Public Spaces\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/faff9da0e20b8f5223099d707e940d8e\",\"name\":\"John Lorinc\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/73e05cb61860b63be76ffccf72a4d736?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/73e05cb61860b63be76ffccf72a4d736?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"John Lorinc\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/author\/john\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"LORINC: Tearing down Gardiner East is all in the numbers - Spacing Toronto","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"LORINC: Tearing down Gardiner East is all in the numbers - Spacing Toronto","og_description":"Does the melodrama over the projected two- to ten-minute delay that may occur due to the removal of the lower portion of the Gardiner resemble a farce that\u2019s played out in Toronto before? Absolutely. We went through this whole charade about a decade ago, on St. Clair West, when the Toronto Transit Commission released aContinue reading \"LORINC: Tearing down Gardiner East is all in the numbers\"","og_url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/","og_site_name":"Spacing Toronto","article_published_time":"2015-05-11T12:04:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-11T20:14:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1600,"height":1067,"url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/05\/gardiner-ashton-pal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"John Lorinc","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Spacing","twitter_site":"@Spacing","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"John Lorinc","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/","url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/","name":"LORINC: Tearing down Gardiner East is all in the numbers - Spacing Toronto","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/05\/gardiner-ashton-pal.jpg","datePublished":"2015-05-11T12:04:55+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-11T20:14:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/faff9da0e20b8f5223099d707e940d8e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/05\/gardiner-ashton-pal.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/05\/gardiner-ashton-pal.jpg","width":1600,"height":1067},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2015\/05\/11\/rounding-error\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"LORINC: Tearing down Gardiner East is all in the numbers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website","url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/","name":"Spacing Toronto","description":"Canadian Urbanism Uncovered  |  Toronto Architecture, Urban Design, Public Transit, City Hall, Parks, Walking, Bikes, Streetscape, History, Waterfront, Maps, Public Spaces","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/faff9da0e20b8f5223099d707e940d8e","name":"John Lorinc","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/73e05cb61860b63be76ffccf72a4d736?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/73e05cb61860b63be76ffccf72a4d736?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"John Lorinc"},"url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/author\/john\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51792","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4051"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51792"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51792\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":51814,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51792\/revisions\/51814"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51800"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51792"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51792"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51792"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}