![\"The](\"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2016\/04\/20160429-Pedestrian-Clip.jpg\")
At the time, the deaths of pedestrians across the continent were still rare enough to warrant coverage from out of town newspapers. Toronto newspapers\u00a0covered fatalities in New York City, for example. Williams death was the first of its kind at home, and the police reaction was unusual by modern standards.<\/p>\n
Firstly, Smith, the driver, was allowed to continue his journey to Hamilton after striking Williams. Though the Globe<\/em> described him as “greatly excited” by the incident, it wasn’t immediately deemed necessary to detain him. Authorities later changed their mind and\u00a0ordered his arrest in Hamilton, but the automobile\u2019s owner intervened and convinced police to stand down.<\/p>\n At an inquest held the next day, a coroner\u2019s jury returned a verdict of accidental death. Witnesses said the auto had been traveling at a \u201cmoderate\u201d speed and Smith had been sounding the horn for half a block prior to the collision.<\/p>\n Speed still\u00a0may have been\u00a0a factor in Williams\u2019 death. Automobiles of the era were\u00a0capable of reaching speeds of around 60 km\/h. Evidence presented at the inquest showed\u00a0Smith\u2019s car was stationary about half a metre after the collision, suggesting\u00a0the driver\u00a0may have already been braking\u00a0when contact occurred.<\/p>\n Based on witness accounts, it appears Williams entered the road to board the streetcar, saw the automobile, but was unable to hop back up the curb in time. It can reasonably be assumed he never expected to encounter a motorized vehicle at all. In 1905, autos were still a rare and controversial plaything of the wealthy.<\/p>\n It\u2019s for that reason famous names tend to turn up in reports of automobile incidents. The region\u2019s first speeding ticket was given to Cawthra Mulock, a well-known Toronto philanthropist and businessman, who was caught traveling at more than 60 km\/h\u00a0in Richmond Hill.<\/p>\n A driver employed by Ambrose Small, a theatre impresario who would later disappear under mysterious (and still unresolved) circumstances, was responsible for the city\u2019s second auto death in September, 1906.<\/p>\n Just three blocks east of where Lenton Williams died, 45-year-old Jane Porter was hit at the intersection of College and Palmerston. The automobile, en route to High Park and traveling at around 15 km\/h, ran over Porter and dragged her for several metres.<\/p>\n Porter was sitting on the steps of the College Street Baptist Church in the moments before the collision, according to the Globe.\u00a0<\/em>She wore a grey skirt, a silk waistcoat under a waterproof overcoat, and a white straw hat with a black-and-white spotted veil.<\/p>\n According to witnesses, Porter stepped into the road and proceeded to cross, unaware of the approaching automobile.<\/p>\n “The front wheels passed over her body, and her feet were caught between the spokes of the wheels, dragging her along until the machine was stopped a few yards from where the accident occurred,” the Globe<\/em>\u00a0grimly reported.<\/p>\n The occupants of the car\u2014chauffeur George Seager, Ambrose Small’s parents, Daniel and Ellen, and Small’s wife, Theresa\u2014attempted to help the mangled woman, but she died at the scene about 15 minutes after the collision. The only clue to her identity was a gold watch engraved with the initials “P. J.”\u00a0There were\u00a0$8 in bills and a pair of eye glasses in her chatelaine.<\/p>\n As in the Williams’ incident,\u00a0the driver was not detained, and once again a coroner\u2019s jury returned a verdict of accidental death.<\/p>\n Just before Porter\u2019s death, Montreal recorded its first pedestrian death caused by an automobile when 47-year-old Antoine Toutant was struck and killed\u00a0on St. Catharines Street. In that case, however, the driver was found guilty of manslaughter and sentenced to six months in prison.<\/p>\n “Everyone has a\u00a0right to cross or to walk on a street,” Judge Choquet said in his ruling. “It is no excuse that the pedestrian does not see the vehicle or does not hurry to get out of the way. Unfortunately the law is not applied in Montreal. Every driver acts as if he owned the streets.”<\/p>\n In 1906, the public was still\u00a0largely of the opinion\u00a0that streets were for moving people on foot just as much as automobiles and streetcars. “In all cases on the King’s highway the pedestrian has the right of way over vehicles of any sort,” the Globe<\/em>\u00a0reminded its readers in an editorial that year.<\/p>\n “It is quite proper to blow a horn or make some other signal to get out of the way, but he may be blind, or deaf, or imbecile, and therefore his failure to get out of the way does not justify the driver who kills or injures him.”<\/p>\n In Toronto, deaths and injuries caused by automobiles\u00a0became increasingly common. In June, 1907, an out-of-control auto struck three children on Kingston Road\u00a0near Woodbine Avenue, resulting in numerous\u00a0broken bones and cuts.<\/p>\n In that case, the driver\u00a0lost control at the top of the hill near Norway Cemetery and careened\u00a0towards Queen Street, knocking 14-year-old Harold Baker from his bicycle, and sending 11-year-old Eva Wharfe and her younger brother flying more than 4 metres.<\/p>\n Both Baker’s legs were broken, one seriously enough for doctors to consider amputation, and Eva Wharfe’s back was seriously wounded. A streetcar driver who witnessed the incident estimated the car’s speed to be close to 60 km\/h.<\/p>\n![\"toronto](\"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2016\/04\/20160429-Pedestrian-Auto2.jpg\")
![\"toronto](\"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2016\/04\/20160429-Pedestrian-University.jpg\")