We are City Planners who have spent many years involved in the planning of Toronto\u2019s downtown waterfront. We have also recently chosen to live there. We hope the Government of Canada will reject the Government of Ontario\u2019s plan to expand Billy Bishop. Here\u2019s why:<\/p>\n
Through their various governments and agencies, the people of Toronto have invested decades, and vast amounts of money in pursuit of redeveloping the downtown waterfront. As a result, Toronto has emerged as a true waterfront city. A formerly obsolete and derelict industrial zone has been transformed into a thriving and popular recreational district that serves millions of the region\u2019s residents and visitors. It is also a major residential community where thousands of people of all incomes and demographics enrich the area\u2019s unique urban mix. Similar planning and investment dollars are currently going into re-developing the East Bayfront, including commitments to extending the Harbourfront LRT eastward to service the expanding urban waterfront there.<\/p>\n
Currently limited to short range aircraft, Billy Bishop Airport positively contributes to that mix. Its usage and infrastructure are in balance with the recreational and neighbourhood uses.<\/p>\n
Enabling larger, long range aircraft to use it will, by orders of magnitude, increase the airport\u2019s volume of passengers, flights, and the need for additional transit and parking facilities. As far as we know, there is no plan or funding commitment to improve access to an expanded airport. –
\nApparently the province hopes to provide additional parking by expropriating the area and surroundings of Little Norway Park, an important central waterfront amenity that offers beautifully established gardens and a unique baseball diamond.<\/p>\n
Moreover, the park is surrounded by hard to replace housing, including affordable rental units, and co-op buildings for disabled individuals and for artists. Immediately to its east is the newly commissioned Irish Memorial and its related theatre, and a local school and community centre. The thought of bulldozing such important public spaces and damaging needed housing is difficult to comprehend, all the more because all the above housing and facilities was made possible by federal government support and financing in the 1980\u2019s kick-off of the re-development of Toronto\u2019s Central Waterfront.<\/p>\n
Moreover, the already heavy traffic congestion at Bathurst and Lakeshore Boulevard makes it hard to imagine much improvement to vehicular access. Similar is the case for public transit. The airport is currently serviced by the Bathurst streetcar, which terminates at Fleet Street, and the Harbourfront LRT, which is accessed at Queens Quay West. Extending these lines south to the airport terminal would be expensive and disruptive while providing only marginal capacity improvements relative to greatly increased demand.<\/p>\n
In summary, this radical proposed expansion of the airport will create order-of-magnitude increases in demand for access infrastructure that will be difficult and extremely expensive to meet.<\/p>\n
It also risks wiping out the pleasure enjoyed by millions of Canadians, and rendering wasted the human, political, and financial resources that have gone into waterfront rejuvenation.<\/p>\n
That prospect is cause for alarm. The concern is not just about jets or noise. It\u2019s about radically shifting the delicate balance on Toronto\u2019s downtown waterfront and compromising its quality as a unique urban asset.<\/p>\n
The question we’re asking is why? Access between downtown Toronto and Pearson International has been greatly enhanced by the UP Express, bringing Union Station within 20 minutes travel time of a major hub airport.
\nThe enormous expansion of the GTA has also shifted the demand for airport access to a far broader distribution of origin points, dwarfing the downtown need for additional airport access.<\/p>\n
We suggest that future federal and provincial investment in supplementing Torontonians\u2019 access to air travel be directed to responding to regional shifts in airport-bound demand and further improving operations at Pearson.<\/p>\n