{"id":9156,"date":"2010-02-01T10:30:55","date_gmt":"2010-02-01T15:30:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spacingtoronto.ca\/?p=9156"},"modified":"2013-01-21T12:54:37","modified_gmt":"2013-01-21T17:54:37","slug":"city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/","title":{"rendered":"City seeking members for new Sign Variance Committee"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

As<\/a> we<\/a> have<\/a> seen<\/a>, allowing politicians to adjudicate on new billboard applications can be, well, problematic<\/a>.\u00a0 That’s why City Council is setting up a new citizen-led Sign Variance Committee<\/a> to make sound decisions based on planning principles rather than personal preferences (or lobbying, or campaign contributions, or any of the other complicating factors of politics).<\/p>\n

On Thursday night, City staff held a voluntary information session for potential applicants, helpfully clarifying a lot of the details that aren’t fully explained online<\/a>.\u00a0 Two dozen people came out (including me), which would have been more encouraging if all but one hadn’t been men (including me).<\/p>\n

Applications<\/a> are due at 4:30 p.m. on Thursday, February 11, so there’s still time to get your name in.\u00a0 Committee members will get $250 per meeting attended, and it’s expected that the committee will meet monthly, so if you’re an urban policy wonk (and, for goodness sake, why are you reading this if you’re not?), it should sound like a pretty sweet gig.\u00a0 Read on for details.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Though the particular procedural rules have yet to be drafted, the Sign Variance Committee (SVC) will be more or less modelled on the Commmittee of Adjustment<\/a>, Licensing Tribunal<\/a>, and Property Standards Committee<\/a> \u2014 quasi-judicial bodies consisting of citizens appointed by Council that meet on a regular basis to arbitrate on matters of contention.\u00a0 The SVC, as its name implies, will be ruling on requests for variances to the Sign By-law, or in other words, whether to grant permission to erect a sign that minorly deviates from the provisions of the bylaw.\u00a0 In the case of first-party (business identification) signs, the SVC will serve as the body to which decisions of the Chief Building Official can be appealed; in the case of third-party (billboard) signs, the SVC will be the primary decision-making entity.\u00a0 (Council has, however, reserved for itself the right to “reconsider” the SVC’s decisions in those cases where it feels the committee should have refused a variance that it ultimately approved.)<\/p>\n

The current volume of third-party variance requests is 120\u2013150 a year, so although no one knows what to expect under the new system, the intention is for the five-member panel to meet monthly; meetings will be held at City Hall during the day, with the length of the meeting dependent on the number of applications being heard.\u00a0 The City is looking for people with<\/a> a “broad knowledge” in the areas of “law, planning, architecture,” and\/or\u00a0 \u2014 and this is where your ears should perk up \u2014 “citizen advocacy.”<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

(Check “yes” or “no.”)<\/em><\/p>\n

But when the enabling bylaw was making its way through Council, Adam Vaughan \u2014 who chairs the Civic Appointments Committee<\/a> that will select the SVC’s members \u2014 also slipped in some wording to exclude the people they don’t<\/em> want: namely, ad industry lackeys.\u00a0 You are not allowed to be part of the Sign Variance Committee if you’re “an owner, employee or agent of an advertising agency, communications or media relations agency” or if you’re “an employee, agent or owner of a business which owns, controls or has shares in a media outlet.” So \u2014 unlike certain committees<\/a> \u2014 don’t expect a solid bloc of Spacing<\/em> editors on this one.<\/p>\n

What if, however, your relationship with the media isn’t really described by any of the above?\u00a0 Say, you’re a contributor to a blog or a freelancer for a newspaper?\u00a0\u00a0 City staff suggest you be “up front” about this in the Conflicts of Interest section of the application by describing the relationship and the remote possibility of a potential conflict; the Civic Appointments Committee is really only looking to weed out people who might have consistent conflicts, but it’s better to let them know about your situation than not.<\/p>\n

Members’ appointments will officially wrap up when the current term of Council does (November 30, 2010) but will realistically be extended until a new batch of applicants has been solicited the following spring. Committee members are free to re-apply next year, and Council will probably want about half of them to stick around.<\/p>\n

That said, for some people, one whole year of mediating between folks like this<\/a> and folks like this<\/a> may be more than enough.<\/p>\n

Jonathan Goldsbie has been tracking variances for years as part of the Toronto Public Space Committee<\/a>‘s Billboard Battalion but would happily relinquish that role in order to sit on the Sign Variance Committee.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As we have seen, allowing politicians to adjudicate on new billboard applications can be, well, problematic.\u00a0 That’s why City Council is setting up a new citizen-led Sign Variance Committee to make sound decisions based on planning principles rather than personal preferences (or lobbying, or campaign contributions, or any of the other complicating factors of politics).Continue reading “City seeking members for new Sign Variance Committee”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4078,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_ef_editorial_meta_paragraph_assignment":"","_ef_editorial_meta_date_first-draft-date":"","_ef_editorial_meta_checkbox_needs-photo":"","_ef_editorial_meta_number_word-count":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21759,2],"tags":[11,1050,2737,13748,756,14203,5216,14204,3162,22085,14202,14205,14206,391],"class_list":["post-9156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-features","category-politics","tag-ad-creep","tag-adam-vaughan","tag-billboard-applications","tag-chief-building-official","tag-city-council","tag-civic-appointments-committee","tag-jonathan-goldsbie","tag-licensing-tribunal","tag-media-outlet","tag-politics","tag-property-standards-committee","tag-sign-variance-committee","tag-toronto-public-space-committee-s-billboard-battalion","tag-usd"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nCity seeking members for new Sign Variance Committee - Spacing Toronto<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"City seeking members for new Sign Variance Committee - Spacing Toronto\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"As we have seen, allowing politicians to adjudicate on new billboard applications can be, well, problematic.\u00a0 That’s why City Council is setting up a new citizen-led Sign Variance Committee to make sound decisions based on planning principles rather than personal preferences (or lobbying, or campaign contributions, or any of the other complicating factors of politics).Continue reading "City seeking members for new Sign Variance Committee"\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Spacing Toronto\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-01T15:30:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2013-01-21T17:54:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/network\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2010\/02\/MicCheck.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jonathan Goldsbie\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Spacing\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Spacing\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jonathan Goldsbie\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/\",\"name\":\"City seeking members for new Sign Variance Committee - Spacing Toronto\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/network\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2010\/02\/MicCheck.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-01T15:30:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-01-21T17:54:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/5f7342200de287697a449a948a0c1ff4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/network\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2010\/02\/MicCheck.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/network\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2010\/02\/MicCheck.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"City seeking members for new Sign Variance Committee\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/\",\"name\":\"Spacing Toronto\",\"description\":\"Canadian Urbanism Uncovered | Toronto Architecture, Urban Design, Public Transit, City Hall, Parks, Walking, Bikes, Streetscape, History, Waterfront, Maps, Public Spaces\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/5f7342200de287697a449a948a0c1ff4\",\"name\":\"Jonathan Goldsbie\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/340e0785ae0ab5c7be59a5f73699e0ba?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/340e0785ae0ab5c7be59a5f73699e0ba?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jonathan Goldsbie\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/author\/jonathangoldsbie\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"City seeking members for new Sign Variance Committee - Spacing Toronto","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"City seeking members for new Sign Variance Committee - Spacing Toronto","og_description":"As we have seen, allowing politicians to adjudicate on new billboard applications can be, well, problematic.\u00a0 That’s why City Council is setting up a new citizen-led Sign Variance Committee to make sound decisions based on planning principles rather than personal preferences (or lobbying, or campaign contributions, or any of the other complicating factors of politics).Continue reading \"City seeking members for new Sign Variance Committee\"","og_url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/","og_site_name":"Spacing Toronto","article_published_time":"2010-02-01T15:30:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2013-01-21T17:54:37+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/network\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2010\/02\/MicCheck.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Jonathan Goldsbie","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Spacing","twitter_site":"@Spacing","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jonathan Goldsbie","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/","url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/","name":"City seeking members for new Sign Variance Committee - Spacing Toronto","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/network\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2010\/02\/MicCheck.jpg","datePublished":"2010-02-01T15:30:55+00:00","dateModified":"2013-01-21T17:54:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/5f7342200de287697a449a948a0c1ff4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/network\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2010\/02\/MicCheck.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/network\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2010\/02\/MicCheck.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/2010\/02\/01\/city-seeking-members-for-new-sign-variance-committee\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"City seeking members for new Sign Variance Committee"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#website","url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/","name":"Spacing Toronto","description":"Canadian Urbanism Uncovered | Toronto Architecture, Urban Design, Public Transit, City Hall, Parks, Walking, Bikes, Streetscape, History, Waterfront, Maps, Public Spaces","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/5f7342200de287697a449a948a0c1ff4","name":"Jonathan Goldsbie","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/340e0785ae0ab5c7be59a5f73699e0ba?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/340e0785ae0ab5c7be59a5f73699e0ba?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"Jonathan Goldsbie"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/"],"url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/author\/jonathangoldsbie\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4078"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9156"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9156\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35850,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9156\/revisions\/35850"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/toronto\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}