{"id":27333,"date":"2015-07-14T14:36:37","date_gmt":"2015-07-14T21:36:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/?p=27333"},"modified":"2015-07-14T14:36:37","modified_gmt":"2015-07-14T21:36:37","slug":"transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/","title":{"rendered":"Transportation Plebiscite: ‘no’ better engagement strategies?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

For the past month, many people have eagerly awaited the result of Metro Vancouver\u2019s Transportation Plebiscite: A non-binding vote on a 0.5% sales tax increase to fund transportation infrastructure projects across the region.<\/p>\n

Recently, we have found out that Metro Vancouver residents overwhelmingly voted \u2018no\u2019 to this funding mechanism. 62% of those who voted indicated that they did not want a sales tax increase to fund new transportation infrastructure.<\/p>\n

Without a \u2018yes\u2019 outcome there is no new funding mechanism available to pay for important transportation infrastructure – including roads, subways, bridges, and buses. What is equally problematic is the fact that this plebiscite has not generated any clear understanding of what public wants. A failure by design.<\/p>\n

The plebiscite only tells us \u2018no\u2019 to the tax increase, but we do not know the reasons behind all those no votes. Did people vote no to new transportation, to the individual projects, to TransLink, to the type of tax, to the idea of a plebiscite, etc? Actually, a lot of people didn\u2019t believe that a plebiscite was the appropriate tool for making this type of decision (see the Vancity Buzz survey here<\/a>).<\/p>\n

The plebiscite really hasn\u2019t utilized public engagement to be\u00a0proactive. This is not to say that plebiscites are bad tools for public engagement. It certainly raised awareness about regional transportation issues. There has been a tsunami of press coverage on the subject within local media, and it got many people talking about public transportation. In fact, it got many people thinking about the future of the region! The plebiscite was effective at generating participation, too. Voter turnout was 51.09%, higher than municipal election voter turnout in many cities within the region. These are all good things!<\/p>\n

After the result of the plebiscite was announced Doug Allen, the Interim TransLink CEO, was quoted saying that \u201cThis is democracy.\u201d He is not wrong – this is a type of democratic participation – but the province could have designed a better process, or asked questions that did a better job at understanding what exactly the public values.<\/p>\n

A \u201cyes\u201d vote would have been simple and straightforward. It would have given clear direction. But a \u201cno\u201d vote alone, as it stands, gives leaders little understanding of what people were thinking. It does not tell leaders what people want.<\/p>\n

When designing the plebiscite someone could have made the choice to include an optional one page survey with the ballot package. A one page survey shouldn\u2019t have added too much in cost to the budgeted $6 million dollars<\/a> set aside for the plebiscite. It could have been analyzed separately from the vote to not waste time.\u00a0Alternatively, they could have directed people to a website survey so that voters could provide additional feedback online. This could have been a fairly cost effective option.<\/p>\n

Anything would have been better then just getting a\u00a0\u201cno\u201d back in the mail. A no tells us very little.<\/p>\n

Here is an example of some of the questions a simple survey could have asked:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Please tell us why you choose not to support the .5% sales tax increase?<\/li>\n
  2. What alternative funding options might you be in favour of supporting?<\/li>\n
  3. What mode(s) of transportation do you use to commute and\/or get around?<\/li>\n
  4. Which transportation projects outlined in the plan do you think should be prioritized?<\/li>\n
  5. Do you have any other feedback or comments about the plebiscite engagement process?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    There are various ways these questions could have been asked to generate a specific level of analysis. But these questions have not been asked. We don\u2019t really <\/i>know why voters voted as they did. Other cities considering implementing a plebiscite or referendum on transportation funding should take note of the short-sightedness of this approach.<\/p>\n

    The reality is that we have a \u2018no\u2019 vote and no direction to move forward. This is particularly unfortunate considering that the Mayor\u2019s Council, the TransLink Board, and the provincial government have been discussing alternative funding options since <\/a>at least <\/a>2009<\/a>. These conversations could date as far back as 2001, if you include discussions about the vehicle levy. That is potentially 14 years without progress.<\/p>\n

    A simple \u2018yes\u2019 or \u2018no\u2019 ballot took away the opportunity to be proactive, costing us more in the long run. Delayed decision making isn\u2019t just costing us time. These delays cost money, as well. For example, the no vote could cost Metro Vancouver a loss of up to $1.2 billion a year in potential economic benefits because of increased congestion, according to this independent study<\/a>. The time\/cost\/economic impact is amplified by the lack of clarity and empowerment structured into the plebiscite question<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    Many will speculate why a \u2018no vote\u2019 was the outcome of the plebiscite.\u00a0Jordan Bateman will tell you that \u201cHundreds of thousands of Lower Mainlanders voted for change in the referendum<\/a>\u201d in attempt to push the province and Mayor\u2019s Council towards a core review of TransLink. However, without tangible evidence to support his claim (the kind of evidence that could have been generated from a survey, for example), Bateman\u2019s claims will remain unsubstantiated.<\/p>\n

    The provincial government asked\u00a0Metro Vancouver residents a question about one way to fund new transportation infrastructure projects. Now the real<\/em> question is how will the province take leadership to\u00a0gain continued public input on choosing an alternative funding mechanism?<\/p>\n

    Focus groups? Public consultation? Town halls? Surveys? Hopefully, the government will put effort into figuring out why people voted no, and what alternative funding models the public can get behind.<\/p>\n

    We must move forward. We must do so together. We must do so soon.<\/p>\n

    ***<\/p>\n

    Katelyn McDougall<\/strong> is the Principal and Managing Director of OfCity Consulting<\/a>\u00a0specializing in public engagement and urban policy development.\u00a0Currently she is completing her Masters in Urban Studies at SFU, with a focus on sustainable transportation administration. @katemac22 on twitter.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    For the past month, many people have eagerly awaited the result of Metro Vancouver\u2019s Transportation Plebiscite: A non-binding vote on a 0.5% sales tax increase to fund transportation infrastructure projects across the region. Recently, we have found out that Metro Vancouver residents overwhelmingly voted \u2018no\u2019 to this funding mechanism. 62% of those who voted indicatedContinue reading “Transportation Plebiscite: ‘no’ better engagement strategies?”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8270,"featured_media":27340,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_ef_editorial_meta_paragraph_assignment":"","_ef_editorial_meta_date_first-draft-date":"","_ef_editorial_meta_checkbox_needs-photo":"","_ef_editorial_meta_number_word-count":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[13,11229,11230,25,6670,40],"tags":[293,278,561,31,11604,11602,132,11603,11601],"class_list":["post-27333","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-civic-engagement","category-communication","category-community","category-infrastructure","category-politics","category-transit","tag-democracy","tag-funding","tag-metro-vancouver","tag-planning","tag-public-participation","tag-referendum","tag-taxes","tag-transit-tax","tag-transportation-plebiscite"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nTransportation Plebiscite: 'no' better engagement strategies? - Spacing Vancouver<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Transportation Plebiscite: 'no' better engagement strategies? - Spacing Vancouver\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"For the past month, many people have eagerly awaited the result of Metro Vancouver\u2019s Transportation Plebiscite: A non-binding vote on a 0.5% sales tax increase to fund transportation infrastructure projects across the region. Recently, we have found out that Metro Vancouver residents overwhelmingly voted \u2018no\u2019 to this funding mechanism. 62% of those who voted indicatedContinue reading "Transportation Plebiscite: ‘no’ better engagement strategies?"\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Spacing Vancouver\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/OfCity-Consulting\/345084452229130?ref=hl\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-07-14T21:36:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2015\/07\/blog_image_KM1_600.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"446\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"katelynmcdougall\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@katemac22\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Spacing\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"katelynmcdougall\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/\",\"name\":\"Transportation Plebiscite: 'no' better engagement strategies? - Spacing Vancouver\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2015\/07\/blog_image_KM1_600.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-07-14T21:36:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/#\/schema\/person\/173625c486733989747551e29dc36dd2\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2015\/07\/blog_image_KM1_600.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2015\/07\/blog_image_KM1_600.jpg\",\"width\":600,\"height\":446},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Transportation Plebiscite: ‘no’ better engagement strategies?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/\",\"name\":\"Spacing Vancouver\",\"description\":\"Canadian Urbanism Uncovered | Vancouver Architecture, Urban Design, Public Transit, City Hall, Parks, Walking, Bikes, Streetscape, History, Waterfront, Maps, Public Spaces\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/#\/schema\/person\/173625c486733989747551e29dc36dd2\",\"name\":\"katelynmcdougall\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4004d41e2e29cce16deeb667d3cc3c8d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4004d41e2e29cce16deeb667d3cc3c8d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"katelynmcdougall\"},\"description\":\"Katelyn is the Principal and Managing Director at OfCity Consulting. She has managed projects for PIBC, the City of Nanaimo, Island Timberlands, the ACRD, the City of Parksville, the Burnaby Heights Merchants' Association, and the City of Vancouver's Mayor's Office. She has been involved with several different government and non-for profit organizations, holding executive positions with various boards.\u200b \u200bHer academic and professional interests focus on economic development, social justice, and transportation and land-use integration. Currently she is completing her Masters in Urban Studies at SFU.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.ofcityconsulting.com\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/OfCity-Consulting\/345084452229130?ref=hl\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/@katemac22\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/author\/katelynmcdougall\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Transportation Plebiscite: 'no' better engagement strategies? - Spacing Vancouver","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Transportation Plebiscite: 'no' better engagement strategies? - Spacing Vancouver","og_description":"For the past month, many people have eagerly awaited the result of Metro Vancouver\u2019s Transportation Plebiscite: A non-binding vote on a 0.5% sales tax increase to fund transportation infrastructure projects across the region. Recently, we have found out that Metro Vancouver residents overwhelmingly voted \u2018no\u2019 to this funding mechanism. 62% of those who voted indicatedContinue reading \"Transportation Plebiscite: ‘no’ better engagement strategies?\"","og_url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/","og_site_name":"Spacing Vancouver","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/OfCity-Consulting\/345084452229130?ref=hl","article_published_time":"2015-07-14T21:36:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":600,"height":446,"url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2015\/07\/blog_image_KM1_600.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"katelynmcdougall","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@katemac22","twitter_site":"@Spacing","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"katelynmcdougall","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/","url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/","name":"Transportation Plebiscite: 'no' better engagement strategies? - Spacing Vancouver","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2015\/07\/blog_image_KM1_600.jpg","datePublished":"2015-07-14T21:36:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/#\/schema\/person\/173625c486733989747551e29dc36dd2"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2015\/07\/blog_image_KM1_600.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2015\/07\/blog_image_KM1_600.jpg","width":600,"height":446},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/2015\/07\/14\/transportation-plebiscite-no-better-engagement-strategies\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Transportation Plebiscite: ‘no’ better engagement strategies?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/#website","url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/","name":"Spacing Vancouver","description":"Canadian Urbanism Uncovered | Vancouver Architecture, Urban Design, Public Transit, City Hall, Parks, Walking, Bikes, Streetscape, History, Waterfront, Maps, Public Spaces","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/#\/schema\/person\/173625c486733989747551e29dc36dd2","name":"katelynmcdougall","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4004d41e2e29cce16deeb667d3cc3c8d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4004d41e2e29cce16deeb667d3cc3c8d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"katelynmcdougall"},"description":"Katelyn is the Principal and Managing Director at OfCity Consulting. She has managed projects for PIBC, the City of Nanaimo, Island Timberlands, the ACRD, the City of Parksville, the Burnaby Heights Merchants' Association, and the City of Vancouver's Mayor's Office. She has been involved with several different government and non-for profit organizations, holding executive positions with various boards.\u200b \u200bHer academic and professional interests focus on economic development, social justice, and transportation and land-use integration. Currently she is completing her Masters in Urban Studies at SFU.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.ofcityconsulting.com","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/OfCity-Consulting\/345084452229130?ref=hl","https:\/\/x.com\/@katemac22"],"url":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/author\/katelynmcdougall\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27333","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8270"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27333"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27333\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27374,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27333\/revisions\/27374"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27340"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27333"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27333"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spacing.ca\/vancouver\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27333"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}