![](\"http:\/\/spacingmedia.com\/spacingvancouver\/wp-content\/uploads\/features\/book-reviews_feature-VAN.gif\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Editor: Nancy S. Steinhardt (Princeton University Press, 2017)<\/strong><\/p>\n The study of traditional Chinese architecture and building techniques has come a long way. While Vitruvius\u2019 De Architectura<\/a> (Ten Books of Architecture) introduced the first architectural written treatise in Europe around 30 BC, China\u2019s first architectural treatise, the Yingzao Fashi<\/a>, was only published in 1103 during China\u2019s Song Dynasty. Pre-modern Chinese architecture as an academic discussion only entered China in the late 1930s by a group of Chinese scholars, called the \u2018First Generation\u2019.<\/p>\n The research conducted by these scholars between the late 1920s to early 1940 on Chinese architectural history dominated the course of architectural history throughout the 20th century. The First Generation furthered the research on traditional Chinese architecture as an educational subject by founding the \u2018Society for Research in Chinese Architecture\u2019 in the 1930s. Their mandate was to collect historical data on Chinese architecture by surveying a large number of important structures of various types.<\/p>\n The First Generation\u2019s research expanded the scope of Chinese architectural history by emphasizing the importance of history and culture in the realm of architecture and engineering. Their research and findings had a lasting impact on the study of Chinese history of architecture that was passed from the \u2018Second Generation\u2019 to the \u2018Third Generation\u2019.<\/p>\n Fu Xinian<\/a> was part of the Second Generation scholars, who worked at the Tsinghua University under the supervision of one of the founders of the First Generation scholars, Liang Sicheng<\/a>. Subsequently, Xinian\u2019s research work became well-known in Europe and North America through the translation of his leading essay Chinese Traditional Architecture<\/a> in 1984. Ever since, his work has been a major contributor in understanding the interplay between the preservation of traditional design and new inventions in Chinese architecture.<\/p>\n Traditional Chinese Architecture: Twelve Essays<\/em><\/a> is the most recent of Xinian\u2019s translations. Much larger in scale than previous publications, the book is a series of 12 essays on Chinese Architecture from the Warring State Period (475-221 BCE) to the Ming and Qing Dynasty (1644-1911).<\/p>\n The translation project was spearheaded by Nancy Steinhardt<\/a>, Professor of East Asian Art at the University of Pennsylvania. Her goal was to \u201cinform an English-reading audience who has read a survey of Chinese architecture [\u2026] or has spent enough time in China to have seen buildings beyond China\u2019s major cities and sites (Steinhardt, xvii).\u201d<\/p>\n The book approaches the subject matter under two questions:<\/p>\n The first 25 pages of the book consist of a list of the 120 illustrations, all done by Fu Xinian himself, the Preface<\/em> as well as an editor\u2019s note written by Shatzman. This is followed by an overview of the Chinese Dynasties in chronological order, a Map of China and a biography of Fu Xinian.<\/p>\n The main portion of the book is comprised of the 12 essays, which are structured chronologically, starting with a chapter that deals with the representation of early Chinese Architecture on vessels depicted during the Warring States. Each of the chapters consists of an introductory paragraph by the editor followed by illustrations such as drawings of floor plans, elevations, bracket sets and birds-eye view site plans drawn by Fu Xinian.<\/p>\n A particular strength of the book is the detailed explanation of the Yingzao Fashi\u2014the architectural multi-volume treatise from the Song Dynasty that describes the function, form and components of the Chinese Bracket Set. The treatise is used extensively as a source of reference in chapter seven that offers detailed outline on the building modules “cai” and “fen”, along with the height of the modular units in Tang and Song Dynasty.<\/p>\n The builders applied the cai as the basic module for design and construction of timber frame building and the fen as its subsidiary unit. The usage of the cai and fen enabled the onsite construction of the jointed timber-frame structure, which accelerated the building process of the edifices.<\/p>\n Xinian discovered that the concept of modularity as the basis for Chinese construction extended to building units as large as cities, and that the surrounding buildings within a courtyard, building complex or even a city are aligned in a way that the main building is positioned in the geometrical centre. He also derived data from mapping results of Beijing and found out that each architectural complex aligned with Beijing\u2019s main north-south or east-west axis was built on a modular grid and that the building units had fixed dimensions. His extensive research concludes that this modular system was implemented for important buildings as well as imperial cities as early as the Tang Dynasty, extending all the way to the Ming and Qing Dynasty.<\/p>\n Chapter seven is the most compelling and arguably most technical chapter, followed by chapter eight that furthers the discussion on the modules in pre-Tang wooden architecture, timber-frame structures and the Bracket Set. The latter is the primary identifying feature of Chinese construction that helps to date a building and determine regional aspects of Chinese architecture.<\/p>\n The chapter\u2019s focus emphasizes the geographic differences between architecture in Northern China and Southern China, examining variations between imperial and nonofficial architecture: \u201cDo regional building systems exist in Chinese architecture?” And are there \u201c[…] systems distinct from official, government-sponsored constructions?\u201d<\/p>\n The chapter starts with the premise that there is an official style in Chinese architecture that can be traced back from Tang (618-907) to Ming Dynasty (1368 \u2013 1644). It concludes that differences between architecture in North China and South China evolved over the process of transitioning between geographic locations.<\/p>\n As a bookend, each of the Chinese terms mentioned in the book is explained in the Glossary<\/em> that consists of about 1000 Chinese architectural terms.<\/p>\n Traditional Chinese Architecture \u2013 Twelve Essays<\/em> clearly takes the subject of Chinese architecture beyond the introductory level. It is a well-organized, detailed explanation of a very complex and under-researched topic that is increasingly gaining interest. As Steinhardt states, \u201cthis is a book about Chinese architecture for a non-Chinese reader, not a scholarly, word-for-word translation of a scholar\u2019s essays.\u201d A sentiment that accurately reflects its wonderful contribution to the field.<\/p>\n ***<\/p>\n For more information on Traditional Chinese Architecture \u2013 Twelve Essays<\/strong>, visit the Princeton University Press website<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n **<\/p>\n Ulduz Maschaykh<\/strong> is an art\/urban historian with an interest in architecture, design and the impact of cities on people\u2019s lives. Through her international studies in Bonn (Germany), Vancouver (Canada) and Auckland (New Zealand) she has gained a diverse and intercultural understanding of cultures and cities. She is the author of the book, \u201cThe Changing Image of Affordable Housing \u2013 Design, Gentrification and Community in Canada and Europe\u201d<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\n