This week, Spacing Montreal takes a look at what each federal party has in store for cities. For an overview of the issues, see Monday’s post.
The Liberals are a largely urban party. Their willingness to partner with cities is clear from their platform, and from the positive reaction this platform has received from city leaders. Jean Perrault, president of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), says: “The Liberal plan would provide critical tools for turning the tide on the municipal infrastructure deficit. It is the most significant, longest-term, national infrastructure funding plan released to date.” The Liberals can also pride themselves on introducing the Gas Tax transfer to cities back when Paul Martin was in power, a transfer they would maintain in addition to the following promises:
Infrastructure:
The Liberal plan includes a ten-year, $70 billion funding promise for cities (it should be noted that the $25 billion already going to cities through the Gas Tax transfer is included in this $70 billion figure). The funding promise includes $10 billion for basic and green infrastructure, such as clean water and sewage treatment, and clean energy grids, and $4.5 billion for the “Gateways, Corridors, and Borders” of the country to facilitate trade and economic growth. The Liberals also propose an innovative idea: an Infrastructure Bank, which will lend to all levels of government at low rates for long-term infrastructure investments. Citizens will be able to participate in these projects through purchasing so-called tax-free Green Bonds similar to Canadian Saving Bonds, though what makes them “Green” is anybody’s guess.
In sum, it’s clear where the Liberal’s bread and butter is: the city folk of Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver. Their platform represents many of the concerns voiced by cities, though one can wonder why the Liberals weren’t more aggressive on these issues while in power. Perhaps Stephane Dion’s green focus has shifted the party’s priorities, or perhaps it’s just easier to promise green infrastructure as the parliamentary opposition.