• Winter can be a fine time to break out your bike [ Toronto Star ]
• We went to the top but failed to put lid on blue bin fury [ Toronto Star ]
• Food cart plan relies on charity [ Toronto Star ]
• Vendor needed to fund street food pilot project [ Globe and Mail ]
• City council officially endorses street-food pilot project [ National Post ]
• CPI gives fuel to tax critics [ Globe and Mail ]
• Tree must stay: Council [ Toronto Sun ]
• Make Sheppard tunnel a light-rail line, expert says [ National Post ]
• Colleges get $200 million in repair [ Toronto Star ]
• Fight to save Dunlap site coming down to the wire [ Toronto Star ]
Wednesday’s headlines
Read more articles by Monika Warzecha
3 comments
Why does the city feel the need to get involved in everything? Why waste time and money trying to find vendors for new street food when they’ll likely just show up themselves. Now that the rules have been relaxed its only a matter of time before a couple vendors try something new.
Give me a free vendor pass and I’ll set up a crepe cart at the corner of King and Spadina and rake in the money.
“What we are having is one private owner telling the public that our communal interests are somehow less important than his personal interests,” said Pantalone.
So this owner has to endure the repairs and expense caused by a city owned tree?Trees dont cause damage to drains or sewers?We live in a catch-22 city now and Joe heads the lunatic fringe.So you do have to pay for the tree you don’t own on city property, or is it you are responsible for the damage that tree causes on “your?” property.
Wonder when we will get the lobbyist registry??After the next election,or after another computerscam like we had before?The citizens have a right to know its their money,again!