Skip to content

Canadian Urbanism Uncovered

Montreal Waterworks, Part I – The Aqueduct

Read more articles by

Montreal's aqueduct canal at the Crawford Street bridge in Verdun.

Montreal’s aqueduct canal at the Crawford Street bridge in Verdun.

So far, most of my entries here on Spacing and Undermontreal have dealt with Montreal’s sewers as its the one aspect of the underground that I’ve spent the most time exploring. During my time looking into that particular system it’s been hard to avoid the city’s waterworks, both during my time traveling around (and under) and at the City Archives. While the two systems serve entirely different purposes, they still share a few thincgs in common and often intersect in a number of different ways.

While one can’t exactly travel through the waterworks system to the same extent that you can the sewers, there are still a number of different components that can be peered into and occasionally entered.

But before we do that, a little bit of history.

The roots of both networks can be traced back to the 1800s. The waterworks was established during the early 1800s and in turn encouraged the growth of the sewer system. As the water distribution network expanded, sewers became necessary in order to help get rid of it once consumed.

Public records also illustrate how the expansion of the sewer system might have inadvertently helped distribute water into areas that were previously dependent on wells.


English transcript of minutes from a meeting in 1905 involving Montreal’s Health and Sanitation Department. Source: City Archives of Montreal [click image to enlarge]

There are also reports of water pipes having been laid directly along the interiors of the sewers – a practice likely inspired by Paris – but I’ve yet to see such a thing in person. For the most part, the two systems generally stay out of each others way and for obvious reasons.

In regards to subjects already covered on undermontreal, both systems also made use of Riviere St. Pierre, but for different purposes. The city’s first collector sewer relied on the river’s flow to take wastewater away from the city and out into the harbour. Likewise, the City’s first successful waterworks system used the Verdun arm of the river to dispose of the water passing through its system’s wheelhouse.


1861 plan of the Montreal waterworks. Water leaving the wheelhouse at the bottom left corner flowed into Riviere St Pierre. A section of the proposed tailrace channel that would eventually bypass the river can be seen in red. Source: Pistard Archives

A tailrace channel leading south to the St. Lawrence was later added as a substitute for the river. This passage can still be detected today by the straight stretch of Autoroute 15 that defines the west border of Verdun. Buried beneath this tract of land is the St. Pierre Collector sewer, which, much like the tailrace that preceded it, is used today to discharge excess water from the present day filtration plant.

Attempting to explain the history of the entire waterworks system would probably be a bit too much for one post so like I’ve been doing with Riviere St. Pierre, I’ll try and break things down into several posts starting with the aqueduct.

The Montreal aqueduct (or aqueduc, in French) is an open canal that runs a length of roughly 8 kms from LaSalle to Verdun. It’s hard to miss, but it’s also quite easy to forget about and take for granted. Unlike the nearby Lachine Canal, the aqueduct doesn’t have an abundance of picturesque buildings situated alongside it. It has its charms, but more often than not it seems to be more of an obstacle than an attraction.

View Larger Map

A bike path running along the canal’s south side was added during the 1980s, but the aqueduct itself is fenced off, for security reasons and to discourage people from using it for recreational purposes. For anyone following the news in Montreal lately, this public use VS water security aspect might sound familiar. Of course, it’s never too difficult to find an opening to be able to walk along its shore where you’ll often encounter people fishing.

The City of Montreal completed the aqueduct canal in 1856 under the direction of Thomas Keefer. It was designed to bring the “purest” water from the St. Lawrence River to a point where it could then be pumped up towards the central region of Montreal. At the time of its completion, there had already been fifty years worth of attempts by private companies to distribute water to various points across the city. All had failed for a number of different reasons.

The first effort began during the early 1800s. Using a system of wooden pipes, water from a creek (or “spring”) in Cote Des Neiges was transferred around the West side of Mount Royal and into two reservoirs situated in Montreal. Given the small amount of water available from the source, it comes as no surprise that the scheme never quite worked out.

A later system brought in water straight from the city’s harbour, but was soon abandoned when it was realized that waste from the outlet of the William Collector sewer was making the water taste “foul.”

With a rapidly expanding population during the middle of the 1800s, a series of devastating fires, and the spread of industrialization, it was clear that a more comprehensive scheme to distribute water across the city was necessary.

The solution, as proposed by the city’s Chief Engineer Thomas C. Keefer in 1852, involved the aqueduct canal to convey what was found to be the most reliable and “pure” source of water from the St. Lawrence River.

The Lachine Canal was briefly considered as a source of water, but later rejected. One of the reasons was that it was thought its polluted water might be hazardous, not so much for people, but for the iron pipes to be used throughout the distribution system.


Plan of the aqueduct system in 1854 showing the path of the rising mains (red) which delivered water to the McTavish reservoir. This map also shows the proposed path of a tailrace channel exiting South of the entrance to the Lachine canal.

The entrance point of the aqueduct was first located at point further East. Today, the broad curve at the Lasalle end of Rue Champlain is attributable to the canal’s original path.

1911 map showing the old and new entrance points to the aqueduct. The bottom entrance was later filled in during the 1920s.

At both entrances, gates designed to regulate the flow of water and to keep ice and other debris from entering the entrance to the aqueduct.


Overlooking the Lasalle end of the aqueduct in Lasalle built during the 1920s. The building in the background was constructed at the same time and currently transfers water from the river to the Charles J. Desbaillets treatment station.

After water entered the aqueduct it was fed by gravity towards a single settling basin 4kms away which encouraged rock and other solids to fall to the bottom. This was the extent of purification at the time.

It would take decades before more substantial steps would be taken to ensure cleaner water. Even by 1878, the Superintendent of the Montreal Water Works preferred the “settling” process over filtration, stating that the water “looks a great deal worse than it is.” He further suggested that purer water could be obtained “with the aid of a small filter in the house” and that boiling it was a good way of “removing all deleterious ingredients.”

Adjacent to the settling basin sat the wheelhouse containing water wheels which powered a pumping station used to force the water uphill through a series of underground iron pipes towards the McTavish reservoir- a good four kilometers away.

1913 map overlay of the Atwater treatment plant property. Click image to launch the Google Maps version which lets you change the opacity between the two layers.

By the 1920s, everything on the property had been either decommissioned or demolished and replaced with a newer purification plant that could be operated using electricity. It also abandoned the settling basin in favour of a series of filtration galleries. This same arrangement is what can be found on the property adjacent to the end of the aqueduct today, albeit with a few upgrades that have since been added.

As for the aqueduct itself, not much has changed since its conception. It’s both wider and deeper than the original, having been altered over the years to meet changing needs. For the most part, its alterations were made in order to increase the horsepower available to hydraulic (and steam) equipment. Given that the current system is now powered by electricity it is likely far larger than it needs to be.

It seems there were also grander plans to use the canal for purposes other than water distribution that were never fully realized. As the city’s chief engineer C. J. Desbaillets pointed out in 1931, “The reason for this large canal is that ultimately the city will develop power from it which will be used for various purposes by the municipal authorities.”

Despite these ambitions, the aqueduct found today is still only used to help transfer potable water using the same principles that were established in its infancy. The methods of purification have changed, and many of the system’s components have been upgraded over time, but the methods used to get water from the St. Lawrence River to downtown Montreal have remained more or less the same.

Up next: Following the waterworks system underground.



  1. The big mains between the Atwater plant and the Mc-Tavish reservoir were replaced by a deep tunnel dug some 20-25 years ago. The tunnel can be located through several service buildings; one is immediately south of the Atwater Market, on the bank of the Lachine Canal, the second is at the northeast corner of Atwater and the CP line (Montréal_Rigaud commuter line), just south of Hawarden avenue.

    It then makes a beeline to Dominion square, where there is no service building on the surface, but adjacent to the underground parking. And then it proceeds to the McTavish plant, the big château south of the reservoir.

  2. Your history much appreciated. I am writing the official history of the Cdn Black Watch (RHR), a Montreal Regiment. I begin with Scot appearance in Mtl c. 1760. Paul Phelps Hutchison, The Early Scots At Montreal, c. 1960) wrote: “General Amherst (1760)… settled his troops for the night in a field which is now the Cote des Neiges Reservoir… that night the French plenipotentiaries came out to negotiate for the surrender at the farmhouse, which later became known as ”Capitulation Cottage”. It was in the reservoir field and not, as many have thought, the bigger freestone house known as ”Amherst House” further along Cote des Neiges The latter at the end of the Victorian Era was owned by Lieut. Colonel J.A.L. Strathy, who commanded our [the 5th Royal Scots] Highlanders from 1893 to 1897; he knew the history of the district and gave his home the Amherst name.”
    Question: is this the reservoir in front of the Royal Canadian Hussars Armoury (4185 Côte-des-neiges, H3H-1X2)? Is the stone building across from Armoury “the cottage”?
    Lastly, Did “Blue Bonnets Raceway” get name from the three Highland Regiments that camped in area c. 1760?
    Thank you and Best Regards, RJJ

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *