Skip to content

Canadian Urbanism Uncovered

7 comments

  1. Generally speaking, I don’t think Stephen Harper is the anti-christ, or that he’s been a terrible Prime Minister (though, I didn’t vote for him). But boy he really picked the wrong battle on this one, and it looks like it will cost him his job. Putting aside the question of his fitness to be PM, however, the process being undertaken by the “coalition” appears to be constitutional, so I say good for them.

  2. As I wrote in much greater length on my blog this morning (click on my name above for the link), the problem with the Conservatives isn’t that they’re wrong about the economy, it’s that they seem just as interested in destroying the opposition as they are in fixing the country…and that does not work.

    For the record, I think it’s wise to wait for Obama to finialize his plan before we finalize ours. Working at cross-purposes with the Americans won’t get us anywhere and like it or not, when we signed NAFTA we signed away the ability to support ourselves and thus the ability to singularly control our own economy.

    By including party financing in the Economic Statement, the Tories proved they do not have the necessary focus to guide us through the dark times. They’re always going to want to stick it to the Liberals and a minority government can’t be allowed to act in that manner.

  3. It certainly is a fascinating issue and I am following the news as much as the next guy, but it seems to me that the crisis in the federal government is barely tangentially related to public space and the urban landscape…

  4. Brent: I would argue that a coalition government would address a handful of urban issues such as transit, environment, appointment to the Toronto Port Authority (now the Lisa Riatt is an MP), etc….

  5. In light of that Statscan report on declining farm populations, a city-rural balance is more important than ever.