Skip to content

Canadian Urbanism Uncovered

Friday’s headlines

Read more articles by

WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT
• New Toronto Port Lands strategy involved private talks with mall operator  [Globe & Mail]
• Australian firm eyeing waterfront mall [The Star]
• Fiorito: How can we trust the Fords with the waterfront? [The Star]

TRANSIT
• Police mull charges for driver of fatal bus crash [National Post]
• Drugs found in bus driver’s duffel bag, police say [The Star]
• Police likely to charge TTC bus driver involved in fatal crash [Torontoist]
• TTC driver in fatal crash probed for pot [The Sun]

CITY HALL
• Police board refuses to promote G20 officers [The Star]
• $83-million in cuts means 1,000 fewer police officers: Blair [National Post]
• City buyout puts morale ‘in the toilet’ [The Star]
• Councillor calls for $375,000 study into downtown traffic [The Star]
• Toronto councillors wrestle over Olympics [The Sun]

OTHER NEWS
• Does bland still work in Ontario? [The Grid]
• Up for debate [The Grid]
• Cyclists defend using sidewalk where pedestrian was struck and killed [The Star]
• Sidewalk cyclists face crackdown [The Star]
• Brian Hutchinson: Vancouver riot report suggests more questions than answers [National Post]

3 comments

  1. The Waterfront Toronto proposal is about building great mixed residential and commercial communities that connect the City to the waterfront. A place where Torontonians can live, work and play. Waterfront Toronto is delivering waterfront park and public open spaces, a revitalized Queen’s Quay promanade and transit plan and new mixed-use (East Bay Front and West Don Lands) communities.

    The Disneyesque Ford proposal is not city-building. Ford’s plan, supported by the Federal Toronto Port Authority, has three objectives: to dismantle Waterfront Toronto; to derail the approved waterfront revitalization plan; to and pave the way for their vision of (suburban) development – Canada’s Wonderland and Vaughan Mills combined. Toronto will be poorer if the Fords and Toronto Port Authority achieve any of these objectives

  2. @KEVIN BECHARD

    Do you have any links to articles directly mentioning Toronto Port Authority involvement?  I’ve only seen articles about Toronto Port Lands Company,a City of Toronto entity, and the only recent articles about TPA in Google News are about the sail-in cinema.

  3. @Kevin Bechard — I’ve looked for something — anything — to support your assertion that the TPA is supporting the Ford plan for the Port Lands. I don’t see a thing. I can assume that you are either A) in error, or B) not researching your assertions very well. You’re undermining your own credibility.